Bill Siwicki
Healthcare IT News
Originally posted 29 August 23
While AI adoption is increasing in healthcare, there are privacy and content risks that come with technology advancements.
Healthcare organizations, according to Dr. Terri Shieh-Newton, an immunologist and a member at global law firm Mintz, must have an approach to AI that best positions themselves for growth, including managing:
- Biases introduced by AI. Provider organizations must be mindful of how machine learning is integrating racial diversity, gender and genetics into practice to support the best outcome for patients.
- Inventorship claims on intellectual property. Identifying ownership of IP as AI begins to develop solutions in a faster, smarter way compared to humans.
Healthcare IT News sat down with Shieh-Newton to discuss these issues, as well as the regulatory landscape’s response to data and how that impacts AI.
Q. Please describe the generative AI challenge with biases introduced from AI itself. How is machine learning integrating racial diversity, gender and genetics into practice?
A. Generative AI is a type of machine learning that can create new content based on the training of existing data. But what happens when that training set comes from data that has inherent bias? Biases can appear in many forms within AI, starting from the training set of data.Take, as an example, a training set of patient samples already biased if the samples are collected from a non-diverse population. If this training set is used for discovering a new drug, then the outcome of the generative AI model can be a drug that works only in a subset of a population – or have just a partial functionality.Some traits of novel drugs are better binding to its target and lower toxicity. If the training set excludes a population of patients of a certain gender or race (and the genetic differences that are inherent therein), then the outcome of proposed drug compounds is not as robust as when the training sets include a diversity of data.This leads into questions of ethics and policies, where the most marginalized population of patients who need the most help could be the group that is excluded from the solution because they were not included in the underlying data used by the generative AI model to discover that new drug.One can address this issue with more deliberate curation of the training databases. For example, is the patient population inclusive of many types of racial backgrounds? Gender? Age ranges?By making sure there is a reasonable representation of gender, race and genetics included in the initial training set, generative AI models can accelerate drug discovery, for example, in a way that benefits most of the population.
Here is my take:
One of the biggest challenges is bias. AI systems are trained on data, and if that data is biased, the AI system will be biased as well. This can have serious consequences in healthcare, where biased AI systems could lead to patients receiving different levels of care or being denied care altogether.
Another challenge is regulation. Healthcare is a highly regulated industry, and AI systems need to comply with a variety of laws and regulations. This can be complex and time-consuming, and it can be difficult for healthcare organizations to keep up with the latest changes.
Finally, the article discusses the challenges of inventorship. As AI systems become more sophisticated, it can be difficult to determine who is the inventor of a new AI-powered healthcare solution. This can lead to disputes and delays in bringing new products and services to market.
The article concludes by offering some suggestions for how to address these challenges:
- To reduce bias, healthcare organizations need to be mindful of the data they are using to train their AI systems. They should also audit their AI systems regularly to identify and address any bias.
- To comply with regulations, healthcare organizations need to work with experts to ensure that their AI systems meet all applicable requirements.
- To resolve inventorship disputes, healthcare organizations should develop clear policies and procedures for allocating intellectual property rights.
By addressing these challenges, healthcare organizations can ensure that AI is deployed in a way that is safe, effective, and ethical.
Additional thoughts
In addition to the challenges discussed in the article, there are a number of other factors that need to be considered when deploying AI in healthcare. For example, it is important to ensure that AI systems are transparent and accountable. This means that healthcare organizations should be able to explain how their AI systems work and why they make the decisions they do.
It is also important to ensure that AI systems are fair and equitable. This means that they should treat all patients equally, regardless of their race, ethnicity, gender, income, or other factors.
Finally, it is important to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that respects patient privacy and confidentiality. This means that healthcare organizations should have clear policies in place for the collection, use, and storage of patient data.
By carefully considering all of these factors, healthcare organizations can ensure that AI is used to improve patient care and outcomes in a responsible and ethical way.