By Kelly Bennett
Originally posted: Aug 25, 2016
A Burlington optician is outraged after discovering a psychiatrist he'd never met wrote a critical two-page psychiatric evaluation about him without ever seeing or talking to him.
The optician, Jay Hakim, filed a complaint with the provincial medical regulator, which concluded the psychiatrist's conduct was appropriate.
Hakim appealed the regulator's decision; that appeal was held in a hearing downtown Hamilton on Wednesday.
The case raises "some very serious consequences for society" if it's allowed to stand, Hakim argued.
It also parallels issues raised in the United States over whether psychiatrists can ethically provide opinions on the mental health of presidential candidates they've never met.
The article is here.