Massachusetts Debates ‘Death With Dignity’

By Paula Span
The New Old Age Blog: Caring and Coping
The New York Times
Originally published May 29, 2012

Consider this an update. Last fall, when I talked with some of the 350 volunteers circulating petitions, they sounded confident about collecting 70,000 certified signatures by the end of the year. They more than succeeded, which meant the state legislature had until May 1 to act. It didn’t — to no one’s surprise — so volunteers for the organization backing the referendum, Dignity 2012, have headed back out with their clipboards.

If they can gather another 11,000 signatures by July 2, the public will decide whether the state’s physicians can lawfully prescribe medications with which terminally ill patients can end their lives. (You can read the exact language here.)

Oregon enacted essentially the same law allowing self-administration of lethal drugs in 1997, and Washington in 2009. Though their adversaries often used “slippery slope” arguments, the number of residents who have taken advantage of the laws remains quite small. After meeting all the requirements and undergoing the mandated waiting periods, 114 people received lethal prescriptions last year in Oregon and 103 in Washington. In both states, about a third of those who qualified ultimately decided not to use the drugs.
But the controversy was intense in those states, with contentious public debate and expensive media campaigns, and it will be this round, too. In both camps, fund-raising has already begun.

“It has potent national implications,” the Rev. J. Brian Hehir, secretary for health care and social services at the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston, said of the referendum. “We are talking about fundamental human values, deeply personal choices.”

The entire blog entry is here.

Va. Beach court psychologist suspended

By Andy Fox
wavy.com
Originally published on June 4, 2012

A clinical psychologist was suspended indefinitely and charged with inappropriate behavior with a client after a woman claimed he kissed her.

Local courts relied on Dr. Brian Wald to give advice on parental custody in divorce cases. In documents obtained by WAVY.com the Board of Psychology says Wald is a danger to public health and safety.
His website states he has conducted over 300 parenting capacity evaluations and now he's suspended indefinitely and the likely target of a civil lawsuit.

The entire story is here.

Charlottesville psychologist's license suspended after alleged intimate activity with former client

By Daily Progress Staff Reporters
The Daily Progress
May 25, 2012

The Virginia Board of Psychology has suspended indefinitely a Charlottesville practitioner’s license after her continued intimate and sexual involvement with a former client, according to an order issued by the board.

The document claims Carrie E. Schaffer, a local clinical psychologist, was not truthful in a self-report to the board in 2009 in which she said she ended a relationship with the former client.

The entire story is here.

Thanks to Ken Pope for this information.

New Orleans psychologist sues over negative Angie's List comments

By Michelle Keahey
The Lousiana Record
Originally published May 28, 2012

A New Orleans psychologist has filed a lawsuit against a Florida doctor for negative comments posted on the website Angie's List.


John C. Courtney, Psy D., MP filed the lawsuit against Dr. Bartholomew Vereb and Angie's List Inc. on March 9 in federal court in New Orleans.
 
(cut)
 

Angie's List is accused of negligence for failing to follow its own procedures that would have prevented Courtney's damages, for breaching its duty to Courtney, and for acting with reckless disregard for the truth.

The entire story is here.

Thanks to Ken Pope for this information.

Plastic surgeon suing 10 patients for posting anonymous complaints online

The Palm Beach News

WFTV.com
Originally published May 23, 2012

An Orlando plastic surgeon has posted his explanation on the Internet as to why he's suing several of his patients.

WFTV learned Dr. Armando Soto is suing 10 patients who he said anonymously posted comments online about their bad experiences inside his office in the Dr. Phillip’s neighborhood.

The entire story is here.

Thanks to Ken Pope for the above link.

Dr. Soto's blog is here.

Here is a portion of his blog post.

"In sum, a previously unhappy patient is now on the road to a better outcome, with restoration of a healthier doctor/patient relationship. To us, that’s a great outcome."

Vignette 14: The Psychology of Advertising

Dr. Ron Popeil, a local psychologist, is upgrading his web site.  Along with a variety of upgrades, the web developer/consultant suggests that he add a testimonial page where former patients describe their positive experiences in therapy.  Since the web developer/consultant wants to get that page up and running, he suggests that they use some positive ratings and responses from Angie’s list and several other ratings sites that tell positive stories and experiences with Dr. Popeil.

Dr. Popeil thinks these ideas are good.  However, he researches the APA Ethics Code and believes that he may be acting inappropriately.  To discuss the matter in further detail,  Dr. Popeil calls you for an ethics consult.

What are the ethical issues involved in this situation?

Are there any other concerns about the web developer/consultant’s strategies?

What are some recommendations that you would make to the psychologist?

Missouri Psychologist Indicted for Health Care Fraud

by Staff Reporters
Kansas City InfoZine
Originally published May 27, 2012

Rhett E. McCarty, 67, of Lake Ozark, Mo., was charged in a two-count indictment returned under seal by a federal grand jury in Kansas City, Mo., on Wednesday, May 23, 2012. The indictment was unsealed and made public today upon McCarty’s arrest and initial court appearance in the U.S. District Court in Kansas City, Mo.

McCarty is a licensed psychologist and private practitioner who provided psychotherapy services to recipients of both Medicare and Medicaid in their homes in the Lebanon area. The federal indictment alleges that since Aug. 22, 2008, McCarty has submitted Medicare and Medicaid claims for at least 19 beneficiaries for which he was paid $1,276,334.

(cut)

According to the indictment, McCarty forged (or caused another person to forge) the signatures of beneficiaries on patient sign-in sheets in order to obtain $418,507 in Medicare and Medicaid payments.

The whole story is here.

Paulucci psychologist suspended, fined $50K by state board

A Minnesota psychologist who charged thousands of dollars to organize a client’s closets, attend a funeral and visit a gravesite — and accepted dozens of expensive gifts from the client, Gina Paulucci of Wayzata — was suspended indefinitely and fined $50,000 for her actions, according to a Minnesota Board of Psychology order made public this week.

by Jane Friedman
Minneapolis Star Tribune

Originally published May 25, 2012

A Roseville psychologist who charged thousands of dollars to organize a client’s closets, attend a funeral and visit a gravesite — and accepted dozens of expensive gifts from the client, Gina Paulucci of Wayzata — was suspended indefinitely and fined $50,000 for her actions, according to a Minnesota Board of Psychology order made public this week.

Kathryne Sanders, 63, acknowledged in an interview that her professional relationship with the client went over the line, but said her career as a psychologist is likely over, so she won’t have to pay the record fine due upon reinstatement.

State law requires psychologists to observe strict boundaries between professional and personal relationships, and Sanders said “there were definitely issues there. But I also think this is something that is extremely common. I just don’t think it’s deserving of the penalty that I received.”

The entire story is here.

Bias found in mental health drug research presented at major psychiatric meeting

Medical Express.com

When thousands of psychiatrists attend their field's largest annual meeting each year, the presentations they hear about research into drug treatments report overwhelmingly on positive results.

That's the finding of a new study published in the Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology by two young psychiatrists from the University of Michigan and Yale University, who analyzed the presentations given at two recent meetings of the American Psychiatric Association.

Of 278 studies presented at the 2009 and 2010 APA meetings that compared at least two medicines against each other for any psychiatric illness, they found that 195 had been supported by industry, and 83 funded by other means. The authors then evaluated the studies without knowing which kind of support each one had.

Of the industry-supported studies, 97.4 percent reported results that were positive toward the medicine that the study was designed to test, and 2.6 percent reported mixed results. No industry-sponsored studies with negative results were found.

The entire article is here.

The journal article can be purchased here.