EthicalSystems.org culls years of academic research to educate executives on how to create and maintain an honest, moral company culture.
By Will Yakowicz
Inc.
Originally published on January 22, 2013
What makes good people make unethical decisions? How can you ensure your employees don't accept bribes, cut corners, or cheat when you're counting on them?
These are the questions EthicalSystems, a new nonprofit formed by business school professors, social scientists, and behavior specialists, aims to answer. The group's website, launched in early January, was spearheaded by Jonathan Haidt, a professor of ethical leadership at New York University's Stern School of Business.
The entire article is here.
Welcome to the Nexus of Ethics, Psychology, Morality, Philosophy and Health Care
Welcome to the nexus of ethics, psychology, morality, technology, health care, and philosophy
Showing posts with label Jonathan Haidt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jonathan Haidt. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Friday, January 3, 2014
Ideology Is Heritable Yet Societies Can Change Their Views Quickly
By Jonathan Haidt
Social Evolution Forum
Originally published December 16, 2013
Here is an excerpt:
From my perspective as a social psychologist, who studies morality from an evolutionary perspective, rapid attitude change is not hard to explain. I am impressed by the consistent data on heritability, showing that some very important parts of our moral and political views are innate. But innate does not mean hard-wired or unmalleable; it means “structured in advance of experience, and experience can edit and alter that first draft.” (That’s a paraphrase from Gary Marcus). So even if one is born predisposed to questioning authority and seeking out diversity, life experiences can still alter one’s habitual reactions. Becoming a parent, especially of girls, seems to make people more conservative (they perceive more threats in the world).
The entire article is here.
Social Evolution Forum
Originally published December 16, 2013
Here is an excerpt:
From my perspective as a social psychologist, who studies morality from an evolutionary perspective, rapid attitude change is not hard to explain. I am impressed by the consistent data on heritability, showing that some very important parts of our moral and political views are innate. But innate does not mean hard-wired or unmalleable; it means “structured in advance of experience, and experience can edit and alter that first draft.” (That’s a paraphrase from Gary Marcus). So even if one is born predisposed to questioning authority and seeking out diversity, life experiences can still alter one’s habitual reactions. Becoming a parent, especially of girls, seems to make people more conservative (they perceive more threats in the world).
The entire article is here.
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
The Deep roots of Our Political Divide
This Is Interesting Podcast
Originally aired December 4, 2013
Matt Miller interviews Jonathan Haidt on politics, perspective, morality, and justice.
The entire podcast is here.
Originally aired December 4, 2013
Matt Miller interviews Jonathan Haidt on politics, perspective, morality, and justice.
The entire podcast is here.
Sunday, March 10, 2013
It's Hard to Gross Out a Libertarian
The NYU psychologist on sex and the culture war
By Jim Epstein
Originally published on February 26, 2013
“Morality isn’t just about stealing and killing and honesty, it’s often about menstruation, and food, and who you are having sex with, and how you handle corpses,” says NYU social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, who is author of The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics.
By Jim Epstein
Originally published on February 26, 2013
“Morality isn’t just about stealing and killing and honesty, it’s often about menstruation, and food, and who you are having sex with, and how you handle corpses,” says NYU social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, who is author of The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics.
Saturday, August 25, 2012
Haidt on Colbert
Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt discusses his book "The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion".
The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive
Monday, June 11, 2012
Our moral motivations
Humans have evolved from being driven by self-interest to being team players who want their lives to count for something, argues University of Virginia psychologist Jonathan Haidt.
The Monitor on Psychology
June 2012, Vol 43, No. 6
Print version: page 24
In the midst of a superheated election, in which truth is hard to come by and personal attacks are commonplace, it's hard to imagine politics having much to do with morality. However, in his new book, "The Righteous Mind," positive psychology pioneer Jonathan Haidt, PhD, argues that even our divisive political system arose from a deep-seated human need to work toward a greater good.
In his search for the roots of morality, he explores our species' evolution from our individualistic primate ancestors to deeply cooperative human beings, and describes how religious and political institutions helped enable that transformation.
The Monitor spoke with Haidt about his research and how we might bring politics — and psychology — back to their moral roots.
The entire article is here.
Saturday, April 28, 2012
The New Science of Morality - Jonathan Haidt: Edge Video
From Edge Video
"University of Virginia psychologist Jonathan Haidt's research indicates that morality is a social construction which has evolved out of raw materials provided by five (or more) innate "psychological" foundations: Harm, Fairness, Ingroup, Authority, and Purity. Highly educated liberals generally rely upon and endorse only the first two foundations, whereas people who are more conservative, more religious, or of lower social class usually rely upon and endorse all five foundations."
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)